![]() ![]() I’m higher on Michael Pittman Jr., as well. Green (Higgins looks, at least, somewhat similar in build and could win in similar ways). Tee Higgins has a chance to grow with his new QB1 and could gobble-up the leftover volume post-A.J. ![]() This is the type of player that gets pushed-up my board just gimme the high percentiles and plus-athlete and I’m cool going down swinging. Jalen Hurts is the future in Philadelphia QB3 may be a little “hot” for some folks but I believe in the talent-character combination and, worst case, the Konami Code-upside (floor). But that doesn't mean he (Ruggs) isn't complete or capable Gruden's WR1 has averaged 132.5 targets over this 13-year coaching career: /jRLLLRCWHw- ryan May 7, 2020 Ruggs is a bit of a different player than Gruden has had at his disposal in the past. Henry Ruggs was the first wideout off the board and walks into big-time volume in Las Vegas under Jon Gruden, a coach that has a history of peppering his WR1’s (and also a coach that hasn’t had one to build around since his return to the sidelines that should change in 2020). Justin Jefferson will likely have to start and cut his teeth on the outside, before moving back inside and potentially flourishing post-Adam Thielen. Decent capital, and he’ll be able to fill the downfield threat/speed role nicely if called on: Round 2 Duvernay could have his window open immediately. But Brown is small, and has an injury history. Baltimore has Hollywood Brown who profiles as a more explosive (likely more talented) player out of the slot. I think Buffalo is a pretty decent spot but is he destined to just work in tandem with Devin Singletary for the long-term? He has an impressive broken tackle rate coming out of school, and clearly handled the workload, but I think he’s kinda just-a-guy.ĭevin Duvernay also appears to be polarizing. Too high or too low on Zack Moss? You decide. Chicago is out from underneath Mitchell Trubisky, so expect that offense to be in flux for a little while now (but likely headed in the “right” direction). He’s small, had questionable competition, but certainly appears explosive enough. I like the build at 6-2, 216, and he’s fairly high-end across the board (80th percentile, or higher) at multiple metrics of note:Įno Benjamin checked a lot of boxes pre-draft, but his near-undrafted status should be a red flag, especially on a roster that wants to go four wide and pass – a lot.ĭarnell Mooney was one of this year’s late-game riser (right up to the weeks that preceded the draft). Gabriel Davis probably is my favorite bet for “chance to outplay” draft position. So, going through these four rounds, most of this won’t look too surprising to you guys if you caught the earlier tweets/takes. I’ve been sharing some of my rookie thoughts in previous weeks, sharing my top wide receivers here, and top running backs over here. They’re worth the price of admission alone. ![]() Additionally, the boss Nate Liss was kind enough to allow the “I’m Outraged” Patrons into his mind, as he dropped his top-36 over here. ![]() Now, if for whatever reason these rankings aren’t enough for you (please don’t me and hurt my feelings as a result), you can always find more premier rookie rankings at PlayerProfiler. Inside the top-48, I ended up with: 5 quarterbacks, 15 running backs, 24 wide receivers, and 4 tight ends historic (deep) wideout class, whereas the running backs find a cliff quickly, and the tight ends are maybe all-time bad. These rankings assume superflex, as the title would suggest, and obviously full-point PPR. Throw your two favorite darts to make-up the final 50 if you so choose. Four complete rounds of rookie rankings, 48 players total, for your viewing (and drafting) pleasure. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |